Dr Paul Nettle Middle School
150 Boardman St
Haverhill MA, 01830, Essex County
Phone: 978-374-5792
Ranking: (1,201 out of 1,316, bottom 9%)*
Type: Regular Middle School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 5 to Grade 8
School District: Haverhill School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 39 | 41 | 39 | 31 | 36 | 27 | 29 | |||||||
Total Students: | 489 | 517 | 510 | 495 | 523 | 362 | 371 | |||||||
Grade 5: | 125 | 25.6% | 128 | 24.8% | 123 | 24.1% | 102 | 20.6% | 119 | 22.8% | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Grade 6: | 131 | 26.8% | 126 | 24.4% | 112 | 22.0% | 128 | 25.9% | 138 | 26.4% | 127 | 35.1% | 116 | 31.3% |
Grade 7: | 122 | 24.9% | 117 | 22.6% | 140 | 27.5% | 132 | 26.7% | 136 | 26.0% | 128 | 35.4% | 115 | 31.0% |
Grade 8: | 111 | 22.7% | 146 | 28.2% | 135 | 26.5% | 133 | 26.9% | 130 | 24.9% | 107 | 29.6% | 140 | 37.7% |
Ungraded: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 239 | 48.9% | 264 | 51.1% | 262 | 51.4% | 260 | 52.5% | 279 | 53.3% | 201 | 55.5% | 195 | 52.6% |
Female: | 250 | 51.1% | 253 | 48.9% | 248 | 48.6% | 235 | 47.5% | 244 | 46.7% | 161 | 44.5% | 172 | 46.4% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 7 | 1.4% | 11 | 2.1% | 13 | 2.5% | 10 | 2.0% | 9 | 1.7% | 5 | 1.4% | 7 | 1.9% |
Hispanic: | 165 | 33.7% | 177 | 34.2% | 170 | 33.3% | 151 | 30.5% | 149 | 28.5% | 97 | 26.8% | 99 | 26.7% |
Black: | 21 | 4.3% | 26 | 5.0% | 26 | 5.1% | 26 | 5.3% | 24 | 4.6% | 16 | 4.4% | 14 | 3.8% |
White: | 292 | 59.7% | 299 | 57.8% | 298 | 58.4% | 306 | 61.8% | 341 | 65.2% | 244 | 67.4% | 251 | 67.7% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 4 | 0.8% | 3 | 0.6% | 3 | 0.6% | 2 | 0.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 299 | 61.1% | 297 | 57.4% | 271 | 53.1% | 226 | 45.7% | 257 | 49.1% | 160 | 44.2% | 143 | 38.5% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 38 | 7.8% | 29 | 5.6% | 40 | 7.8% | 34 | 6.9% | 39 | 7.5% | 35 | 9.7% | 34 | 9.2% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 12.45 | 12.72 | 13.03 | 16.10 | 14.41 | 13.30 | 12.70 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MCAS | ||||||
2010 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 39% | 43% | 63% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 30% | 48% | 67% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 27% | 41% | 61% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 5th Grade | % proficient | 36% | 51% | 65% |
2010 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 35% | 40% | 55% |
2011 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 27% | 39% | 59% |
2012 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 20% | 34% | 57% |
2013 | Mathematics | 5th Grade | % proficient | 35% | 46% | 61% |
2010 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 27% | 40% | 53% |
2011 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 20% | 34% | 50% |
2012 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 26% | 38% | 52% |
2013 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 5th Grade | % proficient | 27% | 39% | 51% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 53% | 52% | 64% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 60% | 59% | 67% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 42% | 57% | 67% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 35% | 50% | 66% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 45% | 54% | 69% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 38% | 48% | 68% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 33% | 52% | 66% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 6th Grade | % proficient | 40% | 49% | 67% |
2003 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 36.7% | 29.5% | 42% |
2004 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 35% | 34% | 42% |
2005 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 47% | 37% | 46% |
2006 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 29% | 35% | 46% |
2007 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 32% | 35% | 52% |
2008 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 34% | 45% | 56% |
2009 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 30% | 41% | 57% |
2010 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 31% | 42% | 59% |
2011 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 35% | 43% | 58% |
2012 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 34% | 44% | 60% |
2013 | Mathematics | 6th Grade | % proficient | 41% | 46% | 60% |
2003 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 48.2% | 53.8% | 66% |
2004 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 61% | 59% | 68% |
2005 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 48% | 54% | 66% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 50% | 51% | 65% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 55% | 59% | 69% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 57% | 62% | 69% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 40% | 55% | 70% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 28% | 56% | 72% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 40% | 57% | 73% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 46% | 57% | 71% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 7th Grade | % proficient | 35% | 58% | 71% |
2006 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 22% | 26% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 29% | 38% | 46% |
2008 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 30% | 32% | 47% |
2009 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 28% | 37% | 49% |
2010 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 26% | 39% | 53% |
2011 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 32% | 34% | 51% |
2012 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 30% | 37% | 51% |
2013 | Mathematics | 7th Grade | % proficient | 35% | 40% | 52% |
2006 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 66% | 66% | 74% |
2007 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 58% | 65% | 75% |
2008 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 66% | 69% | 75% |
2009 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 64% | 72% | 78% |
2010 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 54% | 67% | 78% |
2011 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 53% | 67% | 79% |
2012 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 65% | 71% | 81% |
2013 | English Language Arts | 8th Grade | % proficient | 49% | 64% | 78% |
2003 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 25.1% | 22.9% | 37% |
2004 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 19% | 27% | 39% |
2005 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 25% | 25% | 39% |
2006 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 20% | 29% | 40% |
2007 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 26% | 34% | 45% |
2008 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 35% | 44% | 49% |
2009 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 29% | 38% | 48% |
2010 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 21% | 40% | 51% |
2011 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 25% | 43% | 52% |
2012 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 32% | 33% | 52% |
2013 | Mathematics | 8th Grade | % proficient | 36% | 41% | 54% |
2003 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 34.4% | 24.8% | 32% |
2004 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 22% | 24% | 33% |
2005 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 24% | 23% | 33% |
2006 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 20% | 21% | 32% |
2007 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 32% | 29% | 33% |
2008 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 31% | 37% | 39% |
2009 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 30% | 29% | 39% |
2010 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 22% | 30% | 40% |
2011 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 15% | 27% | 39% |
2012 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 24% | 27% | 43% |
2013 | Science and Technology/Engineering | 8th Grade | % proficient | 17% | 28% | 39% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Dr Paul Nettle Middle School was rated 1 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.